Kyphoplasty / Vertebroplasty — Dictation, Appropriateness, and Dose for Residents
1. The 85-Year-Old with a Painful Spine Fracture: Your IR Procedure Note
You get the consult. An 85-year-old with a new, exquisitely painful L2 compression fracture after a minor fall. Conservative management has failed, and the spine team wants you to consider cement augmentation. You do the case — a straightforward kyphoplasty. Now it’s time to dictate the procedure note. The attending wants to know the levels, the approach, the cement volume, and, most importantly, a definitive statement on cement leakage. Did any get into the canal? The venous plexus? The disc space? Getting this right isn’t just about billing; it’s about clearly communicating a critical patient safety event.
When I was a fellow, the difference between a good procedure note and a great one was in those details. A great note anticipates every question. It’s structured, precise, and leaves no room for ambiguity. This guide will walk you through that structure, providing a template you can use on call today. For more tools like this, check out our free trainee calculators and references.
2. What Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty Procedure Reports Cover and What Attendings Look For
Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are mainstays for treating painful vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), whether from osteoporosis or malignancy. The goal is to stabilize the fracture and provide rapid pain relief by injecting bone cement (typically polymethylmethacrylate, or PMMA) into the collapsed vertebral body. The core difference is that kyphoplasty involves creating a cavity with a balloon before cement injection, which can help restore some vertebral height, while vertebroplasty is a direct injection.
Your attending expects the procedure note to be a complete, self-contained story. It must clearly document:
- Indication: Why was the procedure done? (e.g., painful acute osteoporotic L2 compression fracture, failed conservative therapy).
- Pre-procedure Imaging Confirmation: A statement confirming review of the MRI that shows marrow edema, proving the fracture is acute.
- Levels Treated: Explicitly list the vertebral levels that were augmented.
- Technique Details: Patient positioning, type of anesthesia, needle access (e.g., bipedicular transpedicular), and whether it was a kyphoplasty (balloons used) or vertebroplasty (direct injection).
- Cement Details: Volume of cement injected at each level.
- Complications: A clear and unambiguous statement about cement leakage. If there was none, say so. If there was, describe its location (venous, intradiscal, foraminal, epidural/canal) and its clinical significance.
3. Radiology Report Template for Kyphoplasty / Vertebroplasty
This template is a solid starting point for your procedure macro. Fill in the bracketed information. The key is to be systematic and address every point, especially the final cement location.
Technique
Procedure: Fluoroscopically-guided [kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty] of [vertebral level(s)].
Indication: [e.g., Painful acute osteoporotic compression fracture at L2, refractory to medical management].
Consent: Informed consent was obtained after the risks, benefits, and alternatives were explained in detail.
Anesthesia: [Conscious sedation with midazolam and fentanyl / General anesthesia].
Technique Details: The patient was placed in the prone position. Using biplane fluoroscopic guidance, the [vertebral level] vertebral body was accessed via a bipedicular transpedicular approach. [For kyphoplasty: A balloon tamp was advanced into the vertebral body and inflated, creating a cavity.]
A total of [X] mL of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement was injected into the [level] vertebral body under continuous, real-time fluoroscopic visualization. Needles were removed, and sterile dressings were applied. The patient tolerated the procedure well.
Findings
Pre-procedure MRI was reviewed, confirming an acute compression fracture at [level] with associated marrow edema on STIR sequences.
Intraprocedural fluoroscopy demonstrated satisfactory placement of needles into the [level] vertebral body. Following injection, there was good distribution of cement within the targeted vertebral body.
Cement Extravasation: [No evidence of cement extravasation into the spinal canal, neural foramen, or epidural venous plexus. / Minimal asymptomatic cement extravasation was noted into the anterior paravertebral soft tissues. / There was evidence of cement leakage into the adjacent superior disc space.]
Impression
- Successful fluoroscopically-guided [kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty] of an acute compression fracture at [vertebral level].
- [No evidence of clinically significant cement extravasation. / Minimal, asymptomatic cement extravasation as described above.]
4. Free Radiology Report Template Sources
Building your own template library is a rite of passage in residency. But you don’t have to start from scratch. Beyond your institution’s shared macros, two great free repositories exist that are worth bookmarking. They are curated by radiologists and cover a huge range of modalities and subspecialties.
- RadReport.org: Maintained by the RSNA, this is one of the most comprehensive and widely used libraries of free, peer-reviewed radiology report templates. (https://radreport.org/)
- Radiology Templates (AU): An excellent, user-friendly collection of templates from Australia, often with helpful diagrams and clinical notes. (https://www.radiologytemplates.com.au/home-page/)
5. The Next-Level Move: Free-Form Dictation to Structured Report
The challenge with templates isn’t finding them; it’s using them efficiently under pressure. Tabbing through fields and deleting negative statements in a complex macro can be slower than just describing what you see. This is where AI-assisted reporting can streamline your workflow. Instead of meticulously filling out a template, you can dictate the key findings conversationally—”Performed a bipedicular kyphoplasty at L3, used 5 cc of cement. Good fill. There’s a little bit of leak into the superior disc space but nothing in the canal.”—and the software does the rest.
Tools like GigHz Precision AI are designed for this. It takes your free-form dictation of positive findings and automatically generates a complete, structured report using vetted ACR and SIR templates. It helps ensure all the critical elements your attending is looking for are present and correctly formatted, without the tedious manual work of navigating a complex macro. This approach supports a more natural dictation style while still producing the high-quality, structured output that modern radiology demands.
6. When Should You Recommend Kyphoplasty or Vertebroplasty? ACR Appropriateness Criteria
Deciding who gets cement augmentation relies on clear indications. The American College of Radiology (ACR) provides evidence-based guidelines to help with these decisions. For the topic of Management of Vertebral Compression Fractures, the Interventional Radiology panel provides several key scenarios.
For a patient with a new, symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) showing bone marrow edema on imaging, both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are considered ‘Usually Appropriate’ initial treatments. This is the classic indication where these procedures shine. The same applies to patients with worsening pain or deformity from a benign VCF, or those with a new symptomatic fracture who have had prior spine surgery.
In contrast, for an asymptomatic, osteoporotic VCF found incidentally, vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are ‘Usually Not Appropriate’. The procedure is for pain relief, not prophylaxis. Conservative management, including analgesics and treatment for osteoporosis, is the recommended path.
For patients with a pathological VCF from malignancy causing ongoing mechanical pain, cement augmentation is also ‘Usually Appropriate’. It provides structural stability and can offer significant palliation. Alternatives in this setting include radiation therapy for tumor control and surgical fixation for cases with significant instability or neurologic compromise. The initial imaging workup for a new VCF typically involves MRI to confirm acuity (marrow edema) and assess for features of malignancy or cord compression.
7. How Much Radiation Does a Kyphoplasty or Vertebroplasty Procedure Deliver?
Vertebral augmentation is a fluoroscopically-guided procedure, so it involves ionizing radiation. Understanding the dose helps in counseling patients and maintaining an ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) mindset. The estimated effective dose for a kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty procedure is typically in the range of 5-15 mSv.
To put this in perspective, this dose is comparable to several months to a few years of natural background radiation, which the average person receives just by living on Earth. While not insignificant, the dose is justified by the significant clinical benefit of immediate pain relief and mobilization for patients with debilitating fractures. Techniques like using pulsed fluoroscopy, collimation, and minimizing fluoroscopy time are standard practice to keep the dose as low as possible.
| Radiation Source | Estimated Effective Dose |
|---|---|
| Natural Background (1 year) | ~3 mSv |
| Kyphoplasty / Vertebroplasty | 5-15 mSv |
| CT Abdomen/Pelvis | ~10 mSv |
8. Kyphoplasty / Vertebroplasty Protocol — Key Steps and Technical Considerations
The success of vertebral augmentation hinges on a precise, stepwise technique performed under continuous imaging guidance. The fundamental goal is to safely deliver cement into the fractured vertebral body while avoiding leakage into critical structures like the spinal canal or venous system. The procedure is typically performed with the patient prone, under either conscious sedation or general anesthesia.
The table below outlines the core phases of the procedure. The most critical step is the cement injection, which must be done slowly with high-viscosity (doughy) cement to allow for immediate termination if any unsafe extravasation is seen on fluoroscopy.
| Procedure Phase | Key Technical Steps & Considerations |
|---|---|
| Pre-Procedure Confirmation | Review MRI to confirm acute fracture with marrow edema on STIR/T2 fat-suppressed sequences. Chronic fractures without edema do not benefit from augmentation. |
| Patient Positioning & Access | Patient is placed prone. Using biplane fluoroscopy, a bipedicular transpedicular approach is used to place trocars into the posterior third of the vertebral body. |
| Cavity Creation (Kyphoplasty) | If performing kyphoplasty, balloon tamps are inserted through the trocars and inflated to create a cavity and potentially restore some vertebral height. Balloons are then removed. |
| Cement Injection | PMMA cement is mixed to a doughy, toothpaste-like consistency. It is injected slowly and incrementally under continuous lateral fluoroscopy. STOP immediately if cement is seen leaking posteriorly toward the canal or into the venous plexus. |
| Completion | Once adequate fill is achieved (or leakage is seen), injection is terminated. Needles are removed before the cement fully hardens. Final AP and lateral images are obtained to document cement distribution. |
A common pitfall is injecting cement when it is too liquid (low viscosity), as this dramatically increases the risk of uncontrolled leakage. Waiting for the cement to reach a thicker consistency is a key safety step. The other major pitfall is failing to stop injection at the first sign of posterior or venous extravasation. Constant vigilance under high-quality fluoroscopy is non-negotiable.
9. The 3-Months-Free Offer for Radiology Residents and Fellows
Look like a rockstar on your reports. We’re offering 3+ months of free access to GigHz Precision AI for all radiology residents and fellows. You can dictate your positive findings in free form, and our AI will generate a complete, structured report using the latest ACR and SIR templates, with the appropriate clinical decision support firing automatically. It’s designed to help you create attending-ready reports faster and more accurately.
All we ask in return is your feedback so we can keep improving the product for trainees. The signup process is simple. There is no credit card required and no long forms to fill out. To get started, just provide three items:
- Your PGY year (e.g., PGY-2, PGY-4)
- Your training type (radiology residency or specific fellowship — IR, body, MSK, neuro, peds, breast, nucs)
- Your training program / hospital name
To get set up, apply for the residents free-access program and reply to the application email with the three items above.
10. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Is GigHz Precision AI HIPAA-compliant?
Yes. The platform is designed for de-identified workflows by default. It processes the clinical content of your dictation to structure the report without requiring or storing patient health information (PHI). All processing occurs over encrypted connections.
Do I need my hospital’s IT department to set it up?
No. GigHz Precision AI is a secure, browser-based tool. There’s no software to install on hospital machines. It works on any modern web browser, including on the call-room computer, your personal laptop, or even an iPad.
Does it work with PowerScribe or other dictation systems?
Yes. It works alongside your existing dictation system. Most residents dictate their findings into the GigHz web app, let the AI generate the structured report, and then copy-paste the final, clean text into their PACS/RIS dictation window. It complements your current workflow rather than replacing it.
Can I customize the report templates?
Yes. While the system comes pre-loaded with ACR, SIR, and other society-vetted templates, you can create and save your own customized versions to match your personal or institutional preferences for specific studies.
What happens after my residency or fellowship ends?
After the free access period for trainees, you have the option to subscribe to a personal plan at a discounted rate for early-career physicians. There is no obligation to continue, and you can export any custom templates you’ve created.
Free GigHz Tools That Pair With This Article
Three free tools that complement the material above:
- ACR Appropriateness Criteria Lookup — Type an indication or clinical scenario in plain language and get the imaging studies the ACR rates for it, with adult and pediatric radiation levels. Built directly from 297 ACR topics, 1,336 clinical variants, and 15,823 procedure ratings.
- GigHz Imaging Protocol Library — A searchable library of 131 imaging protocols with the physics specs surfaced and the matching ACR Appropriateness Criteria alongside. Plain-English narratives readable in 60 seconds, organized by modality.
- GigHz Radiation Dose Calculator — Pick the imaging studies a patient has had and see total dose in millisieverts (mSv) with comparisons to natural background radiation, transatlantic flights, and chest X-rays. Useful for shared decision-making.
Reviewed by Pouyan Golshani, MD, Interventional Radiologist — May 7, 2026