PE Reperfusion / IR Consult Triage
PERC rule and Wells score calculator, plus an educational tool to support monitoring vs escalation decisions and when to involve Pulmonary/PERT and IR.
Not medical advice. Use local PE/PERT protocols and clinical judgment. Do not enter patient identifiers or free-text case details. This tool does not store or transmit data.
PERC rule and Wells score calculator for pulmonary embolism
Use these before imaging. The PERC rule applies only when your gestalt pretest probability is low (under about 15%); if all eight criteria are absent, PE can be ruled out without a D-dimer. The Wells score stratifies pretest probability. The reperfusion triage below is for PE that is already confirmed.
PERC rule (Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria)
Wells score for PE
Two-tier Wells: 4 or less = PE unlikely, more than 4 = PE likely. Three-tier: under 2 low, 2 to 6 moderate, over 6 high. Educational reference; follow local protocols.
Do not enter names, MRNs, dates of birth or other identifiers. Nothing you type is stored.
Clinical decision support for licensed clinicians. Not medical advice and not a substitute for clinical judgment, your PERT, or local protocol. The risk tier comes from this page's calculator rules; the AI only gathers the inputs.
1 Context
Stability window used by this tool: last 4–6 hours (ED).
2 Hemodynamics / Instability Screen
3 RV Dysfunction
4 Biomarkers
Same units for both. Example: hs-TnT upper limit 14 ng/L, so 15–42 is mild and over 42 is marked.
pg/mL and ng/L are the same number for these tests.
5 Trajectory / Objective Deterioration
Objective deterioration within the stability window (ED: 4–6h).
Do not use this if escalation occurred due to bed availability.
6 Timing / Anatomy / Safety Modifiers
- STORM-PE (RCT, 2024): In intermediate-high risk PE, computer-assisted vacuum thrombectomy + anticoagulation improved 48-hour RV/LV reduction vs anticoagulation alone and normalized vital signs earlier; no demonstrated mortality benefit; procedure risks exist.
- PEERLESS (RCT, 2024): In patients selected for catheter intervention, large-bore mechanical thrombectomy outperformed catheter-directed thrombolysis on a composite driven by less deterioration/bailout and less ICU utilization/shorter LOS; no difference in mortality or major bleeding.
- Guideline framing (ESC/ACC summaries): Systemic thrombolysis is reserved for high-risk hemodynamic instability; routine reperfusion is not recommended for stable intermediate-risk PE; catheter-based or surgical options are generally considered for rescue when instability develops or when thrombolysis is contraindicated/failed.
- Access-site bleeding/hematoma; vascular injury
- Pulmonary artery injury/rupture (rare, serious)
- Cardiac irritation/arrhythmias; heart block (device-dependent)
- Hemolysis and possible renal stress (device-dependent)
- Limited reach for distal clot; residual segmental disease may persist
- Potential embolization/clot migration
Need a clinical tool built for your workflow?
We build fast, clinician-centered calculators and decision support tools. If you want this pathway adapted to your hospital's PE/PERT protocol—or want a calculator for another condition—let's talk.
Related clinical tools
Free, physician-built, and built for the same decisions under time pressure.
Written and reviewed by Pouyan Golshani, MD, Interventional Radiologist — Last updated April 7, 2026
Part of the GigHz library: systems doctors were never taught.